4 of 4
4
Why hasn’t Jesus come yet?
Posted: 14 April 2008 08:12 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 46 ]  
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  270
Joined  2007-10-20
Greg - 13 April 2008 08:57 PM
Glorify Him - 13 April 2008 07:08 PM

My words stand alone as truth. If anyone is interested they can check it out ....

Your words do not stand alone as truth—they are only true insofar as they can be supported with facts. You haven’t provided one shred of evidence that you are who you claim to be. If you are indeed an Adventist, your behavior is a discredit to your church.Greg

I’ve given the references for my beliefs. You can take them at face value or check my references. It is not important who the messenger is ... just check the references. For instance ... I say that Ellen White is not preached in my church. I gave you the quote that showed that she herself stated that she should not be quoted from the pulpit. You don’t have to believe I am Adventist to believe that she said this. It is a matter of public record.

 Signature 

Praise God ...  I’ve been Saved by His Blood.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 05 June 2008 10:51 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 47 ]  
New Member
Rank
Total Posts:  6
Joined  2008-05-03

[quote:For a moment, enter into the feelings that our spiritual forefathers had back in 1843 and 1844 after Jesus did not return according to Miller’s predictions. How would they have felt?

“Why didn’t He come?”
“We had the dates right...”
“Why are we still here?” [unquote ]

1. “Why didn’t He come?”

The simple direct answer: The point of chronology chosen from which to count the “2300 days” toward the coming of “Messiah” as “The Prince of Princes” was not correct for proper placement of the prophetic time.

2.“We had the dates right...”

No. We did NOT have the dates right.
If one should chose the wrong point in history from which the count should begin, would it not bring us to a closing point which would be equally an error? The paralleling outline for history from Daniel, chapters 2,7,8, and 11-12 show a sequence for placements of the prophetic “2300 days” beginning with the time, times and the dividing of time” to follow immediately after the decline and fall of the “fourth kingdom” of Dan.7 (or the Roman Empire), which kingdom should follow after the era of Greece of Dan. 8. If we compare and follow this sequence through from Dan.11 through Dan. 12, (exclusive of Dan.9) relative to the taking away of “the Daily” we shall discover in what era both the “time, times, and an half a times” and the 2300 years should commence from that same point of chronology in History.  (1260 +30 +45 + the remainder of years will equal 2300).
But as with the First Advent of Messiah, “No man knows” to the month, the week, “the day, nor the hour of the coming of the Son Of Man.”

3. “Why are we still here?”

William Miller did not stand alone in his concept that Christ might come about that period in the early 1800s. Even the Great reformer Martin Luther wrote of his expectation of the coming of Christ about 150 years from his own time. Also there were at least two other prominent preachers [missionaries], contemporaries of Miller’s time who had and expressed a similar time for expectation concerning the event of Jesus Return. The Time of Jesus Coming has not been “delayed,” neither is it “wrong” to live in Biblical anticipate for the time revealed through His prophet/s, especially Daniel and John, concerning the “nearing years"toward His Second Coming. What is wrong is that we should so adamantly hold to that which has already been proven a falsehood and instruct other in that continuance of the doctrinal error/s.

Were still here because we are still living in the era we have, in error, counted as having come to completion as history. Jesus WILL RETURN for His kingdom people when His years have come to their prophetic close.

“Despise not Prophesying. Prove all things. Hold fast that which is Good (True).” 1Thess.5:19-24.

Profile
 
 
   
4 of 4
4
 
‹‹ HYPER...?      Charles Finney or Ellen White? ››