3 of 10
3
Ellen G. White:  Prophetess of Health? 
Posted: 02 August 2008 07:24 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 31 ]  
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  353
Joined  2006-12-29
Glorify Him - 01 August 2008 04:03 PM
Greg - 01 August 2008 03:41 PM

GH, you didn’t give the information Gabriel asked you to provide. Why won’t you back up your claims with evidence? What is the harm in disclosing your conference affiliation and even the name of your church? Shouldn’t church pastors or their spouses be eager to disclose the church and conference where they work? Your unwillingness to do this implies that you have something to hide.

Greg

Okay. That’s fine with me. I don’t mind you believing that. I think I answered it better than the references given me. But you can believe what you want. If I have no credibility ... fine.

Ok, I’ll give you a more detailed answer in this post regarding references, and I’m expecting in return a better job from you, providing full references regarding yourself, your church, your Conference, in order for us to verify at first hand the claims you made about your Conference, and see if your spouse is allowed to disregard the Church Manual as you pretend..

The first point of Stan was,

Stan Ermshar - 14 July 2008 09:48 AM

The first and most obviously false teaching on health was the area of masturbation. She taught that those who practiced this would become insane or blind and any number of other disorders.

Here are the references for masturbation’s effects on health, bold parts are mine

Children who practice self-indulgence previous to puberty, or the period of merging into manhood or womanhood, must pay the penalty of nature’s violated laws at that critical period. Many sink into an early grave, while others have sufficient force of constitution to pass this ordeal. If the practice is continued from the age of fifteen and upward, nature will protest against the abuse she has suffered, and continues to suffer, and will make them pay the penalty for the transgression of her laws, especially from the ages of thirty to forty-five, by numerous pains in the system, and various diseases, such as affection of the liver and lungs, neuralgia, rheumatism, affection of the spine, diseased kidneys, and cancerous humors. Some of nature’s fine machinery gives way, leaving a heavier task for the remaining to perform, which disorders nature’s fine arrangement, and there is often a sudden breaking down of the constitution; and death is the result. Solem Appeal, page 63

Females possess less vital force than the other sex, and are deprived very much of the bracing, invigorating air, by their in-doors life. The results of self-abuse in them is seen in various diseases, such as catarrh, dropsy, headache, loss of memory and sight, great weakness in the back and loins, affections of the spine, the head often decays inwardly. Cancerous humor, which would lay dormant in the system their life-time, is inflamed, and commences its eating, destructive work. The mind is often utterly ruined, and insanity takes place.  Appeal to Mothers, page 27

Can any expect that God will accept a profession, a form, merely, while the heart is withheld, and they refuse to obey his commandments? They sacrifice physical strength and reason upon the altar of lust, and can they think that God will accept their distracted, imbecile service, while they continue their wrong course? Such are just as surely self-murderers as though they pointed a pistol to their own breast, and destroyed their life instantly. In the first case they linger longer, are more debilitated, and destroy gradually the vital force of their constitution, and the mental faculties; yet the work of decay is sure. While they live, they curse the earth with their imbecile influence, are a stumbling-block to sinners, and cause their friends living sorrow, and an immeasurable weight of anxiety and care as they mark the signs of their decay, and have daily evidence of their impaired intellect.  Appeal to Mothers, page 25

Stan’s second point was about the use of wine in Ellen White’s writings:

Stan Ermshar - 14 July 2008 07:01 PM

She was sometimes inconsistent with regards to the use of wine. She actually advised a PREGNANT woman to take some wine. But for the most part she spoke of the harmful effects of alcohol. She did say that the Bible no where condoned the use of wine..

Regarding the pregnant woman, here is the reference

Before the birth of his children he did not treat his wife as a woman in her condition should be treated. 2Testimonies, page 378

B has been very deficient. While in her best condition of health, his wife was not provided with a plenty of wholesome food and with proper clothing. Then, when she needed extra clothing and extra food, and that of a simple yet nutritious quality, it was not allowed her. Her system craved material to convert into blood, but he would not provide it. A moderate amount of milk and sugar, and a little salt, white bread raised with yeast for a change, graham flour prepared in a variety of ways by other hands than her own, plain cake with raisins, rice pudding with raisins, prunes, and figs, occasionally, and many other dishes I might mention, would have answered the demand of appetite. If he could not obtain some of these things, a little domestic wine would have done her no injury; it would have been better for her to have it than to do without it. In some cases, even a small amount of the least hurtful meat would do less injury than to suffer strong cravings for it. 2 Testimonies, page 383.

The Bible nowhere sanctions the use of intoxicating wine. The wine that Christ made from water at the marriage feast of Cana was the pure juice of the grape. This is the “new wine . . . found in the cluster,” of which the Scripture says, “Destroy it not; for a blessing is in it.” Isaiah 65:8.  Ministry of Healing, page 333

Another of Stan’s points:

Stan Ermshar - 15 July 2008 06:33 PM

Ellen White also taught total abstinence from tea and coffee, even pronouncing that partaking of these beverages was a sin

Tea and coffee drinking is a sin, an injurious indulgence, which, like other evils, injures the soul. These darling idols create an excitement, a morbid action of the nervous system; and after the immediate influence of the stimulants is gone, it lets down below par just to that degree that its stimulating properties elevated above par.  Counsels of Diets and Foods, page 425

The next point made by Stan

Stan Ermshar - 15 July 2008 06:44 PM

Ellen White also taught that meat eating was harmful and stimulated the “animal propensities”, and equated abstaining from meat with being more spiritual.

Meat eating stimulates animal propensities:

We should not make it a practice to place upon our tables food which would injure the health of our children. Our food should be prepared free from spices. Mince pies, cakes, preserves, and highly-seasoned meats, with gravies, create a feverish condition in the system, and inflame the animal passions. We should teach our children to practice habits of self-denial, that the great battle of life is with self, to restrain the passions, and bring them into subjection to the mental and moral faculties Appeal to Mothers, page 19

You should be teaching your children. You should be instructing them how to shun the vices and corruptions of this age. Instead of this, many are studying how to get something good to eat. You place upon your tables butter, eggs, and meat, and your children partake of them. They are fed with the very things that will excite their animal passions, and then you come to meeting and ask God to bless and save your children. How high do your prayers go? 2 Testimonies, page 361

Regarding people being more spiritual if they abstain from eating meat, Ellen White went so far as to affirm that those who are half-converted to the eating of meat will apostatize. Beware, all you Adventists who are still eating meat, you will join our ranks sooner or later

Greater reforms should be seen among the people who claim to be looking for the soon appearing of Christ. Health reform is to do among our people a work which it has not yet done. There are those who ought to be awake to the danger of meat eating, who are still eating the flesh of animals, thus endangering the physical, mental, and spiritual health. Many who are now only half converted on the question of meat eating will go from God’s people to walk no more with them. Counsels on Diets and Foods, page 382

Next point of Stan

Stan Ermshar - 15 July 2008 06:52 PM

Ellen White also condemned mustard, ketchup, and pepper and spices.

In this fast age, the less exciting the food, the better. Condiments are injurious in their nature. Mustard, pepper, spices, pickles, and other things of a like character, irritate the stomach and make the blood feverish and impure. The inflamed condition of the drunkard’s stomach is often pictured as illustrating the effect of alcoholic liquors. A similarly inflamed condition is produced by the use of irritating condiments. Soon ordinary food does not satisfy the appetite. The system feels a want, a craving, for something more stimulating.  Counsels on Diets and Foods, page 339

The people are so far behind that we see it is all they can bear to have us draw the line upon their injurious indulgences and stimulating narcotics. We bear positive testimony against tobacco, spirituous liquors, snuff, tea, coffee, flesh meats, butter, spices, rich cakes, mince pies, a large amount of salt, and all exciting substances used as articles of food. 3 Testimonies, page 21

Stan Ermshar - 15 July 2008 06:52 PM

She also condemned eating between meals as being a sin.

The stomach must have its regular periods for labor and rest, hence eating irregularly between meals is a most pernicious violation of the laws of health. With regular habits, and proper food, the stomach will gradually recover.  Spiritual Gifts, Volume 4A, page 129

For Ellen White, “violations of the laws of health” were sins as serious as violations of the Decalogue, so eating between meals is a “most pernicious” sin.

It is as truly a sin to violate the laws of our being as it is to break the ten commandments. To do either is to break God’s laws. Those who transgress the law of God in their physical organism, will be inclined to violate the law of God spoken from Sinai. Counsel on Diets and Foods, page 17

The transgression of physical law is the transgression of God’s law. Our Creator is Jesus Christ. He is the author of our being. He has created the human structure. He is the author of physical laws, as He is the author of the moral law. And the human being who is careless and reckless of the habits and practices that concern his physical life and health, sins against God. Counsel on Diets and Foods, page 43

It is just as much sin to violate the laws of our being as to break one of the ten commandments, for we cannot do either without breaking God’s law. We cannot love the Lord with all our heart, mind, soul, and strength while we are loving our appetites, our tastes, a great deal better than we love the Lord. We are daily lessening our strength to glorify God, when He requires all our strength, all our mind. By our wrong habits we are lessening our hold on life, and yet professing to be Christ’s followers, preparing for the finishing touch of immortality.  Counsel on Diets and Foods, page 44

This is the Gospel of Health preached by Ellen White, which is supposed to be good news, inspired by God, a comfort for his people. Read, enjoy, and feel the comfort in brings. 

Gabriel

Profile
 
 
Posted: 02 August 2008 07:38 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 32 ]  
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  353
Joined  2006-12-29
Glorify Him - 02 August 2008 06:44 AM

I have no need to be credible. This is a forum. I am simply voicing ‘opinion’ for what it is worth. I am NO authority. For authority .... go to the only authority worth anything ... THE BIBLE.

Glorify Him, why are you using a double standard? Previously you said about what Stan said:

Glorify Him - 30 July 2008 06:16 PM

I’ve been reading a lot of accusations but little or no sources to back up the claims.

Glorify Him - 31 July 2008 06:09 AM

IOWs ... I am expected to find the references to your ‘claims’.  Interesting scholarship.

Why are you expecting us to provide references and back up our claims with proof, and you refuse to do the same? You obviously questioned the credibility of Stan’s claims by asking for sources to back up his claims, we are doing the same with you. Continuing to use a double standard is a testimony against you.

Regarding going to the Bible, we adopted the cry of the reformation sola scriptura., Bible alone principle . We rejected Ellen White as a false prophet, and will expose her false claims wherever and whenever is it necessary. The SDA Church needs to stop endorsing her writings in any way, and get clear in order to be considered a true protestant church.

Gabriel

Profile
 
 
Posted: 02 August 2008 08:57 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 33 ]  
Senior Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1016
Joined  2006-11-24

Excellent points, Gabriel.

Glorify Him is more than willing to hold us accountable for our words, asking for specific references to back up our claims, yet GH is unwilling to be subjected to the same scrutiny. What a double standard.

Greg

Profile
 
 
Posted: 02 August 2008 10:05 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 34 ]  
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  270
Joined  2007-10-20

Cute come back Greg. I will give you credit for that one.

Back to the discussion ...

Here is the proof:  I will make a statement. There is no person ... no church board .... no church ... no conference ... and no Union in the SDA church that totally follows the Church Manual.  It is impossible. Have you read all the stuff that is in there. It is a joke. It is a conglomeration of rules to make both sides of the fence happy. It is totallly contradictory.

You ask for proof? Again ... I am not going to provide it . While I have a letter from the conference indicating the use of the “manual” .... if I provided it for this discussion ... can you tell me what difference it would make?

NONE.

I intend to be wise and not cause my brother to stumble and you are free to make fun of that but ...

I follow in wise footsteps.

Have you heard of the SDA connections of people like Billy Graham and Paul Harvey? If either had come out while in their prime and firmly pronounced that they were becoming SDAs ... it would have stopped their witness. Of course ... Paul Harvey joined the church after his career was over. But I think Billy Graham still has work to do that would be stopped if he announced he was an SDA.

So, I will remain a mystery.  The mystery man. Oh Yeah.  It’s your choice to believe me or not.

 Signature 

Praise God ...  I’ve been Saved by His Blood.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 02 August 2008 11:29 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 35 ]  
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  353
Joined  2006-12-29
Glorify Him - 02 August 2008 10:05 AM

Cute come back Greg. I will give you credit for that one.

Mocking is always easy than to address the issue of your double standard, which becomes more obvious with every post.

Glorify Him - 02 August 2008 10:05 AM

Here is the proof:  I will make a statement. There is no person ... no church board .... no church ... no conference ... and no Union in the SDA church that totally follows the Church Manual.  It is impossible. Have you read all the stuff that is in there. It is a joke. It is a conglomeration of rules to make both sides of the fence happy. It is totallly contradictory.

I have no doubt that your church is not applying the Church Manual at every point in practice. The point in question is if the Church is consistent in asking members to affirm their belief in Ellen White when they take their baptismal vow. You affirmed that your conference doesn’t take seriously the question number 8 from the baptismal vow. The only way in which we can verify is to come to your church and ask the conference leaders if they agree with your view.

Glorify Him - 02 August 2008 10:05 AM

You ask for proof? Again ... I am not going to provide it . While I have a letter from the conference indicating the use of the “manual” .... if I provided it for this discussion ... can you tell me what difference it would make?

NONE.

We have not asked for a letter from the conference.  We asked you to provide your personal name and the name of your conference in order to ask them directly if your spouse has the right to skip question number 8 when he examines the candidates for baptism before they are voted by the local church. We want to verify if your Conference allows your spouse to deliberately ignore the Church Manual at this important point, and treat some parts of the Baptismal Vow as optional.

Glorify Him - 02 August 2008 10:05 AM

I intend to be wise and not cause my brother to stumble and you are free to make fun of that but ...

I follow in wise footsteps..

You seems to have another standard for us. Offending us at every step, mocking us, stand in contrast to your protective attitude toward your conservative church members. Another double standard.

Glorify Him - 02 August 2008 10:05 AM

Have you heard of the SDA connections of people like Billy Graham and Paul Harvey? If either had come out while in their prime and firmly pronounced that they were becoming SDAs ... it would have stopped their witness. Of course ... Paul Harvey joined the church after his career was over. But I think Billy Graham still has work to do that would be stopped if he announced he was an SDA.

Off topic, there is no connection to the subject at hand.

Glorify Him - 02 August 2008 10:05 AM

So, I will remain a mystery.  The mystery man. Oh Yeah.  It’s your choice to believe me or not.

Why are you asking us to believe you without offering any proof? You asks us to offer proofs for what we are affirming here, but you refuse to offer proofs for your claims about the Adventist Church. This double standard disqualifies you from being a person who can be trusted. If you have not the courage of your convictions, let other people speak who have the courage of their convictions, and express your opinions only when you are willing to provide the necessary proofs.

Gabriel

Profile
 
 
Posted: 02 August 2008 01:05 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 36 ]  
Senior Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1016
Joined  2006-11-24

I find it very sad that Glorify Him is so defensive of a system which he/she openly admits is self-contradictory. This shows the lengths to which people will go to protect an income (as a pastor’s spouse) and belief system. It’s apparently less painful for GH to admit that Adventism is self-contradictory than it is to leave this error and go to another church, risking income, family and friendships in the process.

Glorify Him, these words may sound sharp to you, but I pray that you will look back on this someday and realize we were trying to help you. Christianity is not about reconciling self-contradictory teachings and keeping people happy in their erroneous beliefs, it’s about following Jesus at any cost. Many Christian saints have died while standing for truth and you are worried about what a few church members or administrators might think if they knew you disagreed with them about Ellen White. I just find this profoundly sad.

Greg

Profile
 
 
Posted: 02 August 2008 01:38 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 37 ]  
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  270
Joined  2007-10-20

Why are you asking us to believe you without offering any proof?

Please document proof that I have asked you this. Quite to the contrary .... I been specific in stating that I only voice opinion and you are free to disagree. I am not asking anyone to agree with me. In fact ... I support disagreement. No one need agree with me. You are all free to from your own opinions and to think that I am a total fake.

Like I said ... I am the mystery man. Who knows. I could be a Catholic priest. Who knows who cares. I am simply voices my experience (unless I am making it up) and my views.

 Signature 

Praise God ...  I’ve been Saved by His Blood.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 02 August 2008 01:41 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 38 ]  
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  270
Joined  2007-10-20

Glorify Him, these words may sound sharp to you

Hey ... NO biggie ... I understand the game here. And for now (at least for today) I am willing to go along with it.

Do I think this kind of forum is the best use of Christian time?  NO. But if I left then you would have to play the game with yourselves.

 Signature 

Praise God ...  I’ve been Saved by His Blood.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 02 August 2008 01:51 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 39 ]  
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  270
Joined  2007-10-20

Back to the subject at hand ... Health.  Let me quote Ellen White on the subject ...

“Every article of clothing upon the person should be worn so loose that, in raising the arms, the clothing will be correspondingly lifted by the action.” HR, February 1, 1877 par. 6

She explains this further in the following statement ....

“Christians will be judged by the fruit they bear.” CH 102

IOWs ... We will be lifted up according to our actions

Okay ... just a little EGW humor. Poor that it may be.

 Signature 

Praise God ...  I’ve been Saved by His Blood.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 02 August 2008 09:48 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 40 ]  
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1059
Joined  2006-11-24

GH,

It is quite apparent that you belong to a church in which you cannot speak your mind openly. So many SDAs have to go on various forums anonymously using screen names, because they would come under discipline if they spoke openly. I am sure glad I can use my real name without worrying that big brother is watching.

The SDA church has a history of deception that runs deep. They have lied to us about Ellen White, and covered up her plagiarism. They have trashed everyone that dares challenge them on the false doctrine of the sanctuary and the investigative judgment.

There is a large group of SDAs who are really social Adventists or progressives or liberals. They are very disingenious, in that they tell us that they don’t pay attention to EGW, and they pick and choose what they conveniently want to believe, and they maintain their comfortable social club.

Many SDA pastors know that the major distinctive doctrines of Adventism are not true, yet they make a comfortable living in their secure environment, and then retire to draw a large retirement. 

However, there have been notable stories of SDA pastors who have stood up for the truth, and left their comfort zone to follow God’s leading and stand up for the truth, no matter what it cost them.

I would seriously challenge you to really study your Bible carefully and evaluate what you believe. Leave the Ellen White books alone and study the Bible seriously for yourself. Ask for the Holy Spirit to guide you into all truth. Your life will take on new meaning when you do this.

Stan

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 August 2008 07:55 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 41 ]  
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  270
Joined  2007-10-20

I would laugh at you Stan ... if it wasn’t so serious and so sad. You are truly deceived.

 Signature 

Praise God ...  I’ve been Saved by His Blood.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 August 2008 08:40 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 42 ]  
Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  123
Joined  2006-11-25
Glorify Him - 03 August 2008 07:55 AM

I would laugh at you Stan ... if it wasn’t so serious and so sad. You are truly deceived.

It’s easy to make a blanket statement like “you are truly deceived.” Please explain how.

The truth does hurt sometimes, doesn’t it?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 03 August 2008 10:41 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 43 ]  
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1059
Joined  2006-11-24
Glorify Him - 03 August 2008 07:55 AM

I would laugh at you Stan ... if it wasn’t so serious and so sad. You are truly deceived.

Glorify Him,

Please tell me how I am truly deceived. This is a serious charge, and I would hope you could back this statement up.

You think what I said previously was funny?

GH, This is serious business. Discussing issues related to salvation is no joke. You are seemingly treating it this way. I seriously question whether you are truly sincere.  Do you really know the Lord Jesus Christ as your Saviour and Lord?  Do you know for sure that if your life would end tonight, that you would have assurance of salvation? 

In the previous post, I challenged you to really study the Bible and ask the Holy Spirit to lead you. Does this statement strike you as funny?

Are you really serious about your faith?

I am praying right now GH that you would seriously consider these issues, instead of making light of them.

Stan

Profile
 
 
Posted: 04 August 2008 06:21 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 44 ]  
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  270
Joined  2007-10-20

Please tell me how I am truly deceived.

Because you make up lies about my belief and faith ... that are just not worth responding to.

You think what I said previously was funny?

You. Since you are not able to seriously have dialogue. Instead you want to knock down my belief and faith. You make a game of it. Like I said ... if it wasn’t so serious ... it would be a funny joke.

Discussing issues related to salvation is no joke.

LIke I say ... it is you that has been making light of it by not having serious dialogue. You are more interesting in attacking fellow believers and their identity.

Do you know for sure that if your life would end tonight, that you would have assurance of salvation? 

I am saved. Jesus has made the provisions that ALL are saved. All anyone has to do is accept that saved status. And if you had listened to my posts you would know that. But, you are more interested in attacking my faith and church.

Are you really serious about your faith?

This is why I have to laugh. This question is typical.You are not serioius about Bible study or conversation with me. Laugh Laugh. You are only serious about attacking me , my church and my belief. Making accusations that I am not serious is not productive. I am not the subject of this thread. My identity is not the subject.

What is sad here is that so much emphasis is placed on why YOUR doctrine is THE TRUTH. The Gospel of Jesus is simple and you try to attack and dwell on the extremes. In this extreme ... you end up acting UN-Christian. Truth is fine. Searching for truth is fine. But it is the Holy Spirit who convicts of Truth. And you folks here are trying REAL hard to be the Holy Spirit. This is why I say that your belief is fine. I have no problem with it. But I do have problems with the manner in which you go about promoting it. Sad.

You guys could accomplish so much more for God if you went forward proclaiming the LOVE of God. Your witness for TRUTH here is sad. Truth is fine ... but if we have not LOVE then of what value is it. You guys are extremists. And all extremists lack love. My church has them also. When we throw away love and tolerance for the name of extremism ... we lose our witness.

This is a game you guys are playing here. You think that since you have the TRUTH ... that you can go around attacking others. But, if you lack love ... what good is your Truth.

I am praying right now that you would seriously consider these issues,
instead of making light of them. This need not be a game or competition.

 Signature 

Praise God ...  I’ve been Saved by His Blood.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 05 August 2008 06:16 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 45 ]  
Member
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  192
Joined  2007-06-01

GH,

With our differing views, we can both be wrong about a doctrine, but we can’t both be right.  Truth always invites examination.  By the way, as a proclaimed SDA, how can you declare yourself as being fully adopted into God’s wonderful family without first being declared worthy or fit to save through the investigative judgment process?  Sadly, according to Adventist dogma, your case may have already been decided for or against you.  Therefore, accordingly, you may simply be left with playing church--not knowing your true destiny.  After all, official Adventism teaches that your sins (now only conditionally-forgiven) are not even blotted out until Satan finally bears them in his meritorious annihilation for you.

On the other hand, of course, I realize that Seventh-day Adventists don’t believe in salvation here and now anyway.  It is something they merely hope to obtain after the Second Coming if they become perfect enough.  It is the old semi-Pelagianism and Catholic notion of believing that God helps me to save myself.  The assurance of our salvation is vital to our spiritual lives.  Without it our growth is retarded and we are assailed with crippling doubts. Truly, the gospel PLUS ANYTHING ELSE is no longer the gospel. Salvation is a gift to be received, not a goal to be achieved.

Dennis Fischer

Profile
 
 
   
3 of 10
3