SDA Sabbath School Lessons:  An Alternative View
Posted: 27 February 2009 03:47 PM   [ Ignore ]  
Senior Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  320
Joined  2007-06-01

http://www.nonsda.org/egw/ssq2009/toc.htm#intro

Dennis Fischer

 Signature 

In His power and for His glory,

Dennis J. Fischer
Blog:  notesfromdennisfischer.blogspot.com

Profile
 
 
Posted: 10 March 2009 12:57 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]  
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  342
Joined  2007-01-03

I did find the referenced site’s comments here rather amusing:

“In the summer of 1849 a local pestilence struck the region. Mrs. White, seeing this as a fulfillment of prophecy indicating the end of the world, predicts this pestilence will soon become widespread:

“What we have seen and heard of the pestilence, is but the beginning of what we shall see and hear. Soon the dead and dying will be all around us.” (Present Truth, Sept. 1849).

Not long after this prophecy was penned (1849) the pestilence ended and the United States entered a period of relative peace and prosperity that lasted for many years.”

-------

Well, there was that little thing called the Civil War, which commenced just 12 years after the prophecy.  So I wouldn’t say the US entered a period of relative peace and prosperity that lasted many years.  And about 600k people died in that war, more Americans than in all other U.S. wars combined.

However, I agree with the site’s overall emphasis that the much ballyhooed “time of the end” and “shaking” appears not to have occured then or as a result.  And the lessons this quarter, from what I have been able to ascertain from various sources--I haven’t read them myself--are apparently especially bad in their blatant apologetic content.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 16 July 2009 10:47 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]  
Member
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  186
Joined  2009-06-13
glennspring - 10 March 2009 12:57 PM

the lessons this quarter, from what I have been able to ascertain from various sources--I haven’t read them myself--are apparently especially bad in their blatant apologetic content.

A perfect example of someone having no idea what they are talking about - not even having read it for themselves; they still feel justified in spouting off the accusations.  And I suppose next you will try to deny that this site has no “blatant apologetic content?”

Profile
 
 
Posted: 16 July 2009 11:35 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]  
Senior Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  1212
Joined  2006-11-24

I agree that Glenn would do well to read the original sources, but I would encourage him to keep a Bible nearby to fact-check—he’ll need it.

Glenn, how does the title “blatant apologist” fit you? Welcome to the club, my friend.

Greg

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 July 2009 12:36 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]  
Member
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  186
Joined  2009-06-13
Greg - 16 July 2009 11:35 PM

I agree that Glenn would do well to read the original sources, but I would encourage him to keep a Bible nearby to fact-check—he’ll need it.

Glenn, how does the title “blatant apologist” fit you? Welcome to the club, my friend.

Greg

Yes Greg! You are a “blatant” young fellow, however, I wouldn’t go so far as to call anything on this site “apologetics.”

Profile