Jonestown versus Millerism
Posted: 10 October 2009 07:36 PM   [ Ignore ]  
Senior Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  320
Joined  2007-06-01

This history nugget is being written while I am listening to the CNN special report on Jonestown that started and ended with Rev. Jim Jones.  Actually, I have previously viewed this documentary on Jonestown.  The parallels between the days of Jonestown and Millerism are too obvious to miss.  My American history professor was the late Dr. Everett N. Dick from Union College who authored the “forbidden” book in SDA circles entitled, ”William Miller and the Advent Crisis.” This book was actually Dr. Dick’s doctoral thesis at the University of Wisconsin.  This book is a treasured gem in my library.  I love history.  The clarity, integrity, and scholarship of Dr. Dick in his historical assessment of Millerism is most commendable.

After his doctoral thesis turned into a book, Dr. Dick never wrote about Adventism or religion again.  His book was shunned by the General Conference “brethern” at that time.  However, Dr. Dick was a humble, godly man who just turned another cheek when abused.  So, Dr. Dick devoted the rest of his life to Frontier American history.  He wrote many excellent books (i.e.,“The Sod-House Frontier: 1854-1890,” etc.), and he was frequently a visiting professor of history at several public universities.  Today the new administration building at Union College is called the “Everett Dick Building.” I am most honored to have known him personally both inside and outside of the classroom.

Dr. Dick documents and tells about the suicides, homelessness, and insanities (known clinically as “Millerite Madness” in the 1840s) that occurred as a result of Millerism.  The so-called “Great Disappointment” could not have come at a worse time of the year for New Englanders when winter was fast approaching, and the Millerites had no gardens to harvest.  After all, why plant a garden or keep your home when Jesus is going to return on October 22, 1844?  Many devout Millerites sold their homes and businesses in anticipation of Christ’s second coming.  This served to finance the Millerite Movement in a big way.  Interestingly, when all was said and done, unlike most of his followers, William Miller ("Father Miller") had a comfortable farm to return to in upstate New York.  Sadly, there is no evidence that he even offered groceries or shelter to any of his disillusioned followers.  Many ended up in Shaker communities to survive the cold winter.  Many were too embarrassed to even talk to their old friends and neighbors.  For many, time did not heal all wounds.  Remember there was no welfare or medicaid in those days.

Likewise, the followers of Jim Jones sold everything they owned and gave the money to him.  Moreover, wilderness survival has always been an attractive option for cults.  Perhaps you have read Ellen White’s booklet entitled, “Country Livng.” She was strongly opposed to urban living.  Today many SDA academy (secondary) students routinely undergo wilderness survival training as a requirement for graduation.  Cults thrive best in an isolated environment--away from other people and information technology (e.g., the private SDA academies that require students to remain there all year in slavery for tuition).  The students are kept busy gardening, canning, running sawmills, working in bakeries, senior homes, etc.  My wife and I spent an evening visiting such a school in Tennessee many years ago.  It was most depressing to see how controlling the whole place was.  It was not uncommon for students to actually escape from the campus in utter desperation.

Oh yes, the current “Reading Rooms” of the Christian Science cult were preceded by the Millerites also having reading rooms in the larger cities in the 1840s.  With suicide, insanity, hunger, and severe privation, many of the Millerites suffered similar consequences as the followers of Jim Jones and David Koresh did.  The big difference for William Miller was that he survived the whole deceptive ordeal with a comfortable farm home.  Sadly, the harmful effects of his false teaching were imposed upon his followers--a few even wearing ascension robes on October 22, 1844.  The late SDA apologist, F. D. Nichol, almost succeeded in debunking the “ascension robe” stories by his attempt to rewrite Adventist history.  When Christian scholars (savvy in biblical languages) approached William Miller about the wrongness of his fifteen different prophetic charts, he boldly and proudly replied, “I can read my English Bible very well, thank you.” Dr. Dick commented about the disillusioned Millerites, ”Many gave up, some becoming infidels; others went back to their former churches.”

F. D. Nichol, longtime editor of the Adventist Review, L. E. Froom, conditionalist author, and their colleagues were highly regarded in SDA circles when Dr. Everett Dick started his career as a historian.  They saw no need for another historian in a young upstart thwarting their work in any way.  Indeed, Jonestown, Waco, and Millerism have some very sad and uncomfortable commonalities.  By the way, Jonestown reportedly had a few SDA followers that died in the horrific, jungle massacre, and Waco had mostly people with an Adventist background that died in the flames.  Truly, Millerism inspired an intense frenzy for the uncommon, the strange, the most bizarre conspiracy theories, the futuristic, the extrabiblical, and the unbiblical that is still alive and well today.

Dennis Fischer

 Signature 

In His power and for His glory,

Dennis J. Fischer
Blog:  notesfromdennisfischer.blogspot.com

Profile
 
 
Posted: 11 October 2009 09:23 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]  
Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  131
Joined  2007-01-06

Thank you Dennis for telling us about Dr. Dick.  I do not remember where Teresa Beem go her information, but she did talk about the despair, homelessness, suicides, and insanitites in her book “It is Okay not to be a Seventy-day Adventist”.  I was shocked to read about all the history of what happened after Oct 22, 1844.  Even yet, and I have been our of adventism almost 6 years, I still think the best of adventism and am surprised when I find out different.  I guess I just want to think the best of people.  This happens once in a while.  Thanks for the history lesson.
Diana

Profile
 
 
Posted: 12 October 2009 11:01 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]  
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  336
Joined  2009-07-31

Arthur and Teresa Beem have posted on their blog actual copies of newspaper articles from the 1800s (and even into the 1900s) about Millerism and the horrific and gruesome effects of it. Here is the link: http://arthurandteresabeem.blogspot.com/ (scroll down a ways to find the articles).

It has bothered me for some time now how so many former Adventists seem to still respect William Miller, or think that he was alright, simply because he admitted that he was wrong. But what does that mean? It simply means that he admitted that he was a false prophet! How does that do him any good? It simply demonstrates what Scripture teaches--that God is against false prophets and that He will tell them, “I never knew you; DEPART FROM ME, YOU WHO PRACTICE LAWLESSNESS.” (Matthew 7:23 NASB.)

Like Ellen White, William Miller was not someone to be respected, but was a false prophet.

Jeremy

 Signature 

CultOrChristian.com - Does Seventh-day Adventism Teach the Trinity?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 12 October 2009 12:11 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]  
Senior Member
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  320
Joined  2007-06-01

Just an interesting side note about the disappointed Millerite couples who were forced to endure the New England winter (1844-1845) in Shaker communes.  They really didn’t enjoy their stay at the Shaker communes because they were not allowed to share the same bedroom.  Thus, they didn’t stay there any longer than was absolutely necessary for survival (smile).  In the truest sense, they were greatly “disappointed” twice within just a few days.  The Shakers had no problem with these disillusioned couples overstaying their welcome.

Dennis Fischer

 Signature 

In His power and for His glory,

Dennis J. Fischer
Blog:  notesfromdennisfischer.blogspot.com

Profile
 
 
Posted: 26 October 2009 11:08 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]  
Senior Member
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  757
Joined  2006-11-25

I don’t believe that it is totally fair or accurate to compare Millerism with Jonestown. Yes, in all communal type groups you will have a sectarian mentality which can be a breeding ground for fanaticism, but this is true of all major movements with dedicated focus. Jim Jones’ main message when you get right down to it was a facist/communist type organization formed as a commune using some religoin at it’s base. However, if you listen to Jim Jones’ messages, they are primarily fascist and very political in nature.

Jonestown was a cult, Millerism was a movement. No matter how misguided the Millerites were, you cannot compare the two mentalities as the foundation, motives and leaders were different and do differ between cultic communes and revivalism.  You could have said the same thing about the early Wesleyanists, Quakers and Puritans as well.

Profile
 
 
   
 
 
‹‹ Teachings on Angels      Applying God’s Law ››